this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
125 points (97.0% liked)

Selfhosted

39251 readers
261 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.crimedad.work/post/39255

Is self-hosted enough to avoid push notifications going through Apple and Google servers?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rootiest@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Sandboxed GooglePlay services can be used, if needed.

I don't see how that would prevent this at all.

What is being discussed here is governments compromising the push notification service on Apple's servers (and presumably Google's as well)

Sandboxing Google services on your phone does nothing to change the fact that virtually all apps that receive messages/notifications are going to be using the push notification APIs that are compromised.

Whether or not private data is sent in those pushes and whether or not they are encrypted is up to the app developers.

It's common for push messages to simply be used as a triggering mechanism to tell the device to download the message securely so much of what is compromised in those cases will simply be done metadata or even just "a new message is available"

But even so, that information could be used to link your device to data they acquired using other methods based on the timing of the push and subsequent download or "pull"

The problem is that if you go ahead and disable push notifications/only use apps that allow you to, you are going to have abysmal battery life and an increase in data use because your phone will have to constantly ping cloud servers asking if new messages/notifications are available.

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Would applications that don't use GMS be compromised too? Example: everything from F-droid

[–] Rootiest@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think unless they use netfy or a similar alternative then yes.

The vast majority of apps will be using GCM or FCM for notifications.

Now whether or not those push messages are encrypted/don't contain private data is up to the app developer so how much is exposed can certainly vary.

[–] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I get it. ~~Indeed, it's obvious now that even these apps would need to use Google's API~~ I stand corrected. Nope, apps from F-droid usually do not use GCM.

I hadn't heard of netfy before this, I'll have to take a look. I'm assuming that's an alternative FOSS framework for notifications? Can it be used as a drop-in replacement for most applications?

[–] Rootiest@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

You're right, for some reason I thought Firebase was allowed.

Yeah netfy is a FOSS notification service.

As to drop-in replacements, I don't think such a thing really exists on the user side, this is fully up to the app developer in how they want to implement notifications.

To use netfy instead of FCM your app would need to be designed to do so or support it as an alternative option.

[–] plague_sapiens@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yeah you're right. Sandboxed gplay services can still be used to surveil clients, good thing you can use another profile with gplay services and install apps (which needs those) on there, meaning no potential leaks for apps that use their own push notification service and closed APIs (Google or Firebase). Good thread about it: https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/9407-this-is-why-i-use-grapheneos