this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
538 points (87.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43890 readers
740 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for not immediately jumping on my back about it and down voting. I'm certainly not saying that there's no scientific validity to mental disorders, that's absurd and definitely not the take I have and I feel like taking that impression from my original comment is almost willingly misunderstanding what I was trying to say.

[โ€“] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

What are you saying if not that ADA recognized disabilities are no more significant to a person than a possibly made-up personality type?

[โ€“] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

I think what they're getting at is that just because the ADA or whoever recognizes that the disorders exist doesn't mean that everyone who believes they have it has it.