this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
1130 points (98.5% liked)

Programmer Humor

32561 readers
471 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aksdb@feddit.de 51 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There's nothing wrong with UDP. At least not that I know of.

[–] You999@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago (3 children)
[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Klear@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

You are unstoppable!

[–] konalt@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] lud@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

Not my problem.

[–] MooseBoys@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Not really a problem with UDP itself, but with some very old protocols like DNS that rely on UDP but can’t be changed because of compatibility. If you’re writing a new service that uses UDP, there’s nothing stopping you from designing it so that it doesn’t provide an opportunity for bandwidth amplification.

[–] PreviouslyAmused@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

It’s technically not a bug if it’s operating as intended