this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
1745 points (99.9% liked)

Memes

45687 readers
602 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheTechNerd@lemmy.world 78 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I think you can replace all social media with a decentralized version, except YouTube. Reason is cost and monetization.

[–] Guster@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even if YouTube is questionable on privacy-YouTube have more of a product unlike social media where you are the product

[–] darcy@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

with youtube, youre still the product, but at least you get something from it

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

As well as content creators

[–] Cybersteel@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like it's still crazy that YouTube share their ad revenue with their content creators. Granted it's not much but not even tiktok, Instagram nor twitch does that.

[–] darcy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

less would upload otherwise

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep people don't realize the cost of running YouTube, and why all the creators are there.

[–] Deftdrummer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Cause they share that cost, and have the most eyeballs. Far and away.

[–] explodicle@local106.com 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They explicitly say in their description they're not a replacement for YouTube.

[–] explodicle@local106.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which description? That Wikipedia article says "The aim is to provide an alternative to centralized platforms such as YouTube, Vimeo, and Dailymotion."

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The difference to YouTube is that it's not intended to create a huge platform centralizing videos from the whole world on a single server farm (which is horribly expensive).

From their website. It's a very different system, and also not funded by advertisers, which means someone else has to pay the bills.

[–] explodicle@local106.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is PeerTube's purpose to replace YouTube?

We can answer with certainty: no!

The ambition remains to be a free and decentralized alternative: the goal of an alternative is not to replace, but to propose something else, with different values, in parallel to what already exists.

They're saying they're not a "replacement" because it's a decentralized alternative to something centralized. Not because it can't serve the same needs for technical or economic reasons.

[–] DaCookeyMonsta@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's like replacing Amazon for online shopping. Even a coalition of every competitor couldn't touch YouTube.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

You don't need to replace Amazon in it's entirety. You just need to shop from different places selling only a particular category (clothes, books, computer hardware, pet supplies etc) or straight from brand's shop. At least that's what I've been doing. Also haven't renewed my prime subscription for last 2 years.

[–] Kuma@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

All the power to those that like Amazon but I have never bought anything from Amazon and never will. I always look up the cheapest option (that is trustworthy) which Amazon never is. Plus I don't like their business model just like I don't like media mark (they killed of many stores by selling for huge losses for years). we want competition so we want as many stores as possible, we also want experts, so I rather go to a store that sells x type of products not x, y, z and also b like Amazon do.

Also big stores like Amazon only makes sense in the physical form, jumping between stores online isn't physical draining.

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It's probably easier to replace Amazon than YouTube. Free streaming services don't make money, YouTube loses money, Twitch loses money, Kick loses money, the Microsoft one before it died was losing money. If it's free to watch it loses money, and these are companies that do a ton of work to try and make it not lose money, and it just doesn't work.

[–] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately, but we can still try. Any competition in that space is good.