this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
582 points (96.0% liked)

Political Memes

8959 readers
2155 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago (85 children)

Yeah but you dismiss things without providing any counter evidence

When did I do that?

"SCIENCE IS NEVER CERTAIN." Is a cop out dismissal used by people who don't understand science but think because they half listened in science class during the part about scientific method they don't need to provide evidence to back up claims they make.

It is also a factual statement by people who do understand science and are tired of seeing scientific fundamentalism instill a smug sense of certainty in people who claim to be scientific.

I never claimed that astrology is true. All I said was that absolute statements are unscientific.

[–] Tavarin@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (84 children)

You did say astrology could be true:

but like I said I wouldn't be surprised if it turns out to have some actual correspondence to some unknown tangible cause unrelated to the stars

But really you just fell for the Barnum effect.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works -5 points 2 years ago (83 children)

If you don't understand the difference between saying that something is true, and saying that there is a possibility of something being true, you offer no value in scientific discourse.

[–] Tavarin@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (73 children)

Says the person who thinks a single data point with no control is a "test", to someone who is a well published Doctor of Chemistry and has been practicing science for the last 15 years.

Yeah buddy, you go ahead and say I'm the one offering no value to scientific discourse. How many peer-reviewed papers have you published?

[–] 20hzservers@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (9 children)

This guy's a nut job his whole argument is that 100% truth cannot be known while admitting that science is a great tool for knowing 99% of the truth he's actually proud of being 1% correct. 😅

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (71 replies)
load more comments (80 replies)
load more comments (80 replies)
load more comments (80 replies)