497

The Republican leading the probe of Hunter Biden has his own shell company and complicated friends (apnews.com)

submitted 6 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Rep. James Comer, a multimillionaire farmer, boasts of being one of the largest landholders near his rural Kentucky hometown, and he has meticulously documented nearly all of his landholdings on congressional financial disclosure documents – roughly 1,600 acres in all.

But there are six acres that he bought in 2015 and co-owns with a longtime campaign contributor that he has treated differently, transferring his ownership to Farm Team Properties, a shell company he co-owns with his wife.

Interviews and records reviewed by The Associated Press provide new insights into the financial deal, which risks undercutting the force of some of Comer’s central arguments in his impeachment inquiry of President Joe Biden. For months, the chairman of the House Oversight committee and his Republican colleagues have been pounding Biden for how his relatives traded on their famous name to secure business deals.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] voracitude@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago

Accurate. If Hunter Biden broke the law, he should face the consequences. If Comer broke the law, he should face the consequences. It's illegal to use political office for personal gain, so definitely not a loophole if he's treating donors differently in his political decisions.

I will note only one of them is being investigated for prosecution, though.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

Also worth noting: only one of them holds elected office.

Did Hunter Biden break the law? If the indictments against him are true, then yes he did. But I'm not voting for Hunter Biden in 2024. He's not running.

"His son broke the law so Joe Biden must be guilty too" isn't anywhere close to enough to base an impeachment on.

[-] evatronic@lemm.ee 11 points 6 months ago

It should be obvious it's not about reality.

It's about being able to say "Biden was impeached" repeatedly in the news during an election year.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 6 months ago

Honestly I'm kind of surprised they don't just say it without bothering to actually impeach him.

this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023

497 points (99.0% liked)

politics

18075 readers

2711 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News