this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
126 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37551 readers
281 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Steve@communick.news 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)

pick an instance that plans to defederate with them and you're golden.

That's not how this works. This is a threat to the concept of the fediverse. It doesn't matter what instance any of us picks.

Threads already has hundreds of millions of users. Once they activate ActivityPub, they will be hundreds of times larger than the rest of the Fediverse combined. Instantly we will be a tiny minority of the users of this platform. That will give Meta unimaginable influence over this platform and technology.

I'm not sure I can spell it out more clearly.

[–] zaphod@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

No, that's literally how this works.

If you don't like an ActivityPub participant you block it. It's in the architecture.

And given the current fediverse is already a tiny fraction of total social media activity, if a bunch of anti-Threads instances hive off to form their own fediverse subgroup, it'll basically be a no-op from their perspective. They'll just keep talking to each other off in a little corner by themselves just like they're doing today. That's kinda the whole damn point of a federated architecture.