this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
34 points (100.0% liked)

Environment

3918 readers
70 users here now

Environmental and ecological discussion, particularly of things like weather and other natural phenomena (especially if they're not breaking news).

See also our Nature and Gardening community for discussion centered around things like hiking, animals in their natural habitat, and gardening (urban or rural).


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LallyLuckFarm@beehaw.org 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Good thing I've been focusing on bushes, then /s

This really feels like a prime ¿Por que no los dos? moment. Like [@Track_Shovel](@track_shovel@slrpnk.net said, we need to be focusing on turning off the spigot of excess carbon entering the atmosphere, but we should be putting effort into buffering the system as well. Doing one isn't reason to ignore the other.

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's what I was getting at - do both, obviously. I was typing this on a phone before bed, so I missed that part.

[–] LallyLuckFarm@beehaw.org 2 points 11 months ago

I was digging what you were filling

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

¿Por que no los dos?

As soon as I saw the headline I was like "$5 says this guy didn't say stop planting trees, he said that planting trees isn't enough. because it isn't."

[–] LallyLuckFarm@beehaw.org 1 points 11 months ago

Agreed, but I saw a chance for a cheap joke so I dropped the comment first. At this point a lot of folks in this field are advocating for drawdown by reduction and buffering/sequestration by restoring varied ecosystems.