this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
353 points (99.7% liked)

Android

17626 readers
159 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

πŸ”—Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


πŸ’‘Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

πŸ’¬Matrix Chat

πŸ’¬Telegram channels / chats

πŸ“°Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Virkkunen@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And also because Google doesn't sell data.

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 3 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Hahaha. That’s a joke right?

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Do they sell data or sell services using data they collect? Honest question.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I believe generally not. They sell the results of processed data, but the data is their golden goose. Why sell it wholesale, when you can charge for every use of it?

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's what I thought. So they do in a sense sell our data but not directly.

[–] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I think they profile individuals and sell those profiles to ad companies, or in the case of google (ad company AND source of data) they pair ads to devices that fit a profile for the ad, like "rides a bike", "risk averse", "owns several cats" would be a profile for an ad selling cat bike seats that can hold 4 cats. That's one way of using the data but there are many more, each more nefarious than the previous one, I guess culminating with Cambridge Analytica, especially their African endeavours.

Btw is your username in reference to the band can?

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Btw is your username in reference to the band can?

Yes it is! You're only the second person to catch that in my 6 months here.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 10 months ago

Google is the ad company. They don't sell their primary business advantage to competitors.

CA bought data from Facebook, not Google.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You'd be surprised how blatantly companies sell very personal data on a person. Google's not going to do it openly because of pr, but a little subsidiary might

Google probably isn't going to sell everything, but it's pretty likely there's an offshoot company who will sell individual data.

Their data is indeed their golden goose, but if they sell data for individuals at $300 or even $10 a pop, no one is going to get enough of their dataset to compete. They could even rate limit... Although if companies start to pay a billion or 10 to get full data dumps on a country, they might refocus on collection.

After all, the data isn't the true golden goose... It's the golden eggs that they process and sell. It's their ability to collect data that's most valuable

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I challenge you to produce a shed of evidence that Google sells user data.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Here's a list of examples where Google was examined by the courts The first search on the topic I've made

I don't have a smoking gun for you, but I've got a dozen lawsuits saying that Google is lying about their assertion that they don't sell user data

It's not proof, but it's very telling... I'm not saying that Google is directly selling user info, I'm saying that you can buy a list of credit card purchases made by any individual from Equifax for $200

Google isn't selling information directly, but it sure as hell seems like they're selling it indirectly

I haven't looked into the issue deeply, but a casual search has only reinforced my opinion

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago

You think Equifax is buying data from Google? About credit card purchases? Google doesn't even have access to that kind of data. It's credit processors and credit bureaus that are selling you out. Credit bureaus openly do what people accuse Google of doing, yet the complaints about selling data are always directed at Google. People running credit bureaus must be laughing their asses off.

[–] PixxlMan@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

If anything they'd be buying since they're the ones presenting ads... The whole data selling discussion online is always ridiculous. Who are these mystical data buyers ready to shell out billions for crappy "data" (does anyone participating in these discussions actually have a definition of what they think this ridiculously non specific ""data"" even is?) to present slightly better ads to users? Why would Google sell this data, shouldn't they want to keep it to themselves?

[–] Still@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

selling your data refers to people buying ads and being like I want to show my dog food ad to 100,000 people who have a dog, and then Google only shows the ad to people who have a dog

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 0 points 10 months ago

That's not what selling is. At all. Selling implies that any random person with money has access to data about you.

[–] ButtDrugs@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

I know of a SaaS company that charges for their products to end users for a monthly fee. They make significantly more money selling the data of their users to 3rd parties than they do from subscriptions. Also, they figured this out after the fact, it wasn't a core business component when they launched, but they still ended up raising the monthly fees due to "inflation".

[–] Auzy@beehaw.org 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Where do I go to buy a list of your location history off Google if it's not true?

[–] cumberboi@beehaw.org 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ok I just went down a very deep internet rabbit hole and went from believing google definitely sells data to it doesn't sell data to it sells data (kinda). I'd recommend this article on RTB's which explains how google advertisements actually work and how they leak your data (including your location).

I'd also recommend watching the short video by Brave linked in the article - I didn't understand the first part but the actual article explains it quite well, the end is the juicy part.

Hope this helps!

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That was quite informative! Thank you for the article.

[–] cumberboi@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 10 months ago

You don't kill the golden goose.