this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
273 points (98.9% liked)

World News

38500 readers
2957 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

If something hits harder and faster, I'm pretty sure definitionally its more potent.

Potency is a function of its effect relative to the amount used. Like this is more of "yes, AND" type deal, I'm not wrong and you're right to elaborate that this is due to its increased abillity to permeate BBB

different from dextroamphetamine

Unless we're getting into racemics , I'm saying its basically amphetamine + methyl group, lets not get so granular here

Also, meth and amphetamine can be taken such that the doses are equipotent, it would just be less meth and more amphetamine by weight/dosage (all other things like ROA and context being equal)

Re:Serotonin: I believe amphet and meth both affect serotonin dose dependant but I dont think there's any way to say only meth also implicates serotonergic release or transmission