this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
673 points (98.0% liked)

politics

18863 readers
4371 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jonamerica@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

What's the over/under on SCOTUS ruling in favor of Trump when these are eventually appealed?

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

The most proper thing for them to do is probably to say "this is a state election issue, not our place to get involved in"

Which is probably fairly likely, I don't think they'll really want to deal with this, it's an easy way for them to wash their hands of it, leaves the door open for red states to try to find an excuse to remove Biden from the ballot, let's them act like they're respecting the intent of the founders, etc.

If they do decide to take it up, who know? The court is definitely packed with conservative assholes, but even among them, I don't think most of them particularly like trump, and they certainly haven't been as "loyal" to him as he would like, some of them would probably love to see him removed from the ballot in hopes that an actually competent Republican asshole might win.

I think it's probably about a 50/50 shot of SCOTUS actually taking it up, and if they do it's probably about 50/50 again for what the outcome would be.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm guessing they won't hear the case

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Either that or they'll punt it. "We looked at the case and decided that it's up to the states to decide who goes on the ballots and who doesn't."

This would let Colorado and other states kick Trump off the ballot, but it would also open the door to red states kicking Biden off the ballot for "all his crimes which we still have no evidence of."

Then the Supreme Court will eventually need to hear a case on WHAT REASON is good enough to kick someone off the ballot. Is "they fail to meet the requirements" good enough? What about "we don't like this guy and don't want him to win?"

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

In Trumps case he was deemed to have incited insurrection and the constitution tells them he can't hold office.

It's going to be a lot harder for anyone to remove Biden and survive a court challenge unless they also find him guilty of insurrection somehow.