this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
979 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19097 readers
2952 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes, in a bureaucracy, it's CYA all the way down. You pardon possession, then you point to that as precedent to say, "small amount sellers are basically the same, let's pardon them" a while later. It isn't ideal, but it's objective reality. If you have a better way, organize people to change the broader system (and voters) to be more nimble.

[–] dipshit@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As long as we actually do pardon sellers in the future. I hate incrementalism but yeah, what can we do without a larger majority?

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Go back in time a bit and see that earlier incremental step that Biden took on weed, you'll probably fine the exact same comment about "If we actually do the next step" - and now here we are.

He needs to do more, but he's doing enough on most things and the alternative is a black hole

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Go back in time a bit and see that earlier incremental step that Biden took on weed, you’ll probably fine the exact same comment about “If we actually do the next step” - and now here we are.

We need to keep the pressure on. If we were satisfied with "Ugh, fine! We'll look into it if it'll shut you up," we wouldn't be here.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Nobody said anything about taking pressure off. The point is to take a clear moment to accept and acknowledge progress, and then keep pushing for more.

This is not that tone, this is more about people shitting on not getting the entire cake while they are eating a slice of it. You can want the whole cake, but if you miserably eat it slice by slice without enjoying each, before you know it you've eaten the whole cake you've wanted, never enjoying it, and the only thing you have to show for it is a stomach ache and a vague feeling that you never got what you wanted (when again, that whole cake is in your gut at that point).