this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2023
76 points (93.2% liked)

Selfhosted

40696 readers
299 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I just spent a good chunk of today migrating some services onto new docker containers in Proxmox LXCs.

As I was updating my network diagram, I was struck by just how many services, hosts, and LXCs I'm running, so counted everything up.

  • 116 docker containers
    • Running on 25 docker hosts
    • 50 are the same on each docker host - Watchtower and Portainer agent
  • 38 Proxmox LXCs (19 are docker hosts)
  • 8 physical servers
  • 7 VLANs
  • 5 SSIDs
  • 2 NASes

So, it got me wondering about the size of other people's homelabs. What are your stats?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MSgtRedFox@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • 3 DL360G8 Esxi

  • 1 DL380G8 TrueNAS

  • 1 DL360G7 Veeam

  • Delln5070 Extended PVE SophosnUTM

  • 48 Port Catalyst

  • Cisco 2921

  • 50+ VMs and containers. More enterprise than some enterprises.

-----

[–] ReducedArc@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most likely some sum of (cores x Ghz) each processor in all servers? While it kind of makes sense, it feels like a much higher clock speed than what I’m used to seeing.

I have a single quad sock E5-4640 server, I think in terms of me having 4 processors with 8 cores at base 2.4Ghz each; I don’t regularly (or ever, for that matter) think in terms of me having 76.8Ghz.

360G8s should be single or dual sock E5 v2 processors. I can’t really math right now (insufficient caffeine), but I can’t seem to make the math work, so I’d imagine something that to be an aggregated across all three systems, not individual systems?

[–] MSgtRedFox@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, aggregate of all three hosts in cluster, sorry. Dual socket, six cores.

[–] DeltaTangoLima@reddrefuge.com 1 points 1 year ago

Love it! I'm gonna grab a 32RU rack soon. Got most of my stuff in a small ~14RU wall cabinet right now. I was originally aiming for low power everything - RasPis, etc. But I've since bought a couple DL360s, and you just can't beat the sheer grunt factor, especially when paired with Proxmox.