People Twitter

5268 readers

734 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a tweet or similar
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

1904

The dream (lemmy.world)

submitted 11 months ago by Stamets@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

248 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] schmidtster@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Shouldn’t there be a catch all term to explain the broader scope of the specifics?

Science is a broad term for multiple different studies, vehicle is a broad term for cars and trucks.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Machine learning?

[–] TheGreenGolem@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Glorified chatbots. Tops. But definitely not something with any kind of intelligence.

[–] ParetoOptimalDev 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yesterday I prompted gpt4 to convert a power shell script to Haskell. It did it in one shot. This happens more and more frequently for me.

I don't want to oversell llms, but you are definitely underselling them.

[–] schmidtster@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Is that not a type of AI already?

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well, there's an argument over not calling machine learning AI in this very thread, so… ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] schmidtster@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

So why suggest it for the catch all term for AI when it’s only one portion of the argument itself? Such a strange suggestion,

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"Computer Science"

[–] schmidtster@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So people think of programming instead?

[–] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Computer science involves all sciences of computing. It has materials science, logics, maths galore, just to do basic circuitry and chip design. It spirals on and on and on to get a real computer.

The point is it is a culmination of MANY different disciplines, and the people who think it's only "this" or "that" are demonstrating their great lack of knowledge on the subject.

It is a generic term because it takes MANY different things to complete the picture. Pidgeonholing things when you do not even understand them is only an excercise of ignorant stereotyping.

[–] schmidtster@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

That’s too broad, there’s a reason there is already computer science, science itself, science of chemistry/physics/biology/space etc.

Language is fluid, not accepting change just shows how ignorant you are of the broader aspects of the world.