this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
746 points (97.6% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5829 readers
465 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My brother had an mp3 player in 1999. I think it had 16MB of storage space. I didn't see the point of it when you could only put like 5 songs on the thing.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I could fit roughly 1 hour of music on mine, longer if I dropped the bitrate to 96kbps instead of 128.

The biggest benefit of the mp3 player was that the anti-skip protection didn’t drain the battery twice as fast, no moving parts so it never skipped. This seemed super cool to me because I skateboarded and stuff and generally liked the idea of no skips.

[–] Ottomateeverything@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The biggest benefit of the mp3 player was that the anti-skip protection didn’t drain the battery twice as fast

I strongly disagree. In those days, mp3 players that fit single CDs that were slightly larger than a modern day thumb drive. And you could get 128mb ones for slightly more money. But that was much smaller and more portable than something that had to fit an entire CD.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

The biggest benefit for me