this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
81 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37727 readers
536 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
Los@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
81
Carmen Osorio, expert in technology addiction: ‘It’s not a good idea to give children a smartphone; in any case, you let them borrow yours’ (english.elpais.com)
submitted 10 months ago by tardigrada@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org
69 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hersh@literature.cafe 45 points 10 months ago (5 children)

A non-smartphone, that is, a cell phone like the ones that today’s parents had when we were young and with which we made calls and sent text messages, was enough for us, and it did not cause addiction.

That's not the way I remember it. Texting addiction was a thing. That's how Twitter became popular; it was basically a way to broadcast SMS to friends at first.

I guess it's a matter of degrees.

Ad-based services are the real problem here, I think. You don't hear people complaining about Wikipedia addiction.

[–] JillyB@beehaw.org 25 points 10 months ago

I'm a Wikipedia addict but I'm not complaining

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yeah and I remember playing Snake for half a day. And spending all the school breaks bragging with the phones. And once they had color displays, we shared funny 5 second video clips each day. And that was more than 20 years ago.

To be fair, I don't think we were more addicted than you were 'addicted' to Pokemon cards. Extensively watching Peppa pig and Minecraft Lets-plays on daddy's phone at the age of 3 is a new level, though.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Texting addiction was a thing.

It was? Honestly asking. Texting for me was cumbersone (T9) and .10c each (recieving too!) For my friends and I, texts were a means to an end (meeting up usually), not a place to have conversations.

You're not wrong about ads though, the main difference today is that many apps are engineered to be addictive.

[–] bermuda@beehaw.org 3 points 10 months ago

For teens it almost certainly was. The "no phone policy" of many American high schools was implemented long before the iPhone. And yeah, texts may have been 10c each but that wasn't your 10c ;)

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

Twitter is a pub sub system. SMS is a messaging system.

Only the pub sun produces the possibility of endless content to just scroll through.

[–] chahk@beehaw.org 1 points 10 months ago

Agreed! That quote shifts the blame onto parents, and completely ignores a decade's worth of evidence that today's social media platforms were designed to be as addictive as possible. On purpose. For better "engagement metrics" so that they can get kids' eyeballs on more ads.