Asklemmy

43974 readers

627 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

1214

How many Lemmy users are non-technical background? (programming.dev)

submitted 1 year ago by techconsulnerd@programming.dev to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

660 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I think most all of us here on Lemmy are people with technical background. Most of my professional contacts remained using Reddit, Twitter and even excited when Threads launched.

If you are non-tech background, please comment and share what you do for life.

If you have tech background, upvote this to help promote this post so that we can find more non-tech users on Lemmy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Man I'm so glad that zoomers understand the difference between sex and gender, and are doing away with this, "boys do this, and girls do that!" bullshit.

Like, oh yeah, do you know a lot of girls who are, in your mind, uncharacteristically smart? That right? That's not condescending in any way.

[–] mrmanager 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know anyone who would say "uncharacteristically smart" like that. Sounds very offensive.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree. Maybe you shouldn't imply it then.

[–] mrmanager 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't. Maybe you shouldn't read things that aren't there.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe you're just oblivious, but that's exactly what you implied. That "girls" "outsmarting boys" is something novel to you.

[–] mrmanager 1 points 1 year ago

I'm amazed you are reading that into what I said. Seems more likely you want to pick a fight with someone. But I have no interest in that, so let's just stop here. :)