this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
1422 points (97.3% liked)

Greentext

4310 readers
702 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] red@sopuli.xyz 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Could you read and understand the information behind the link before replying with nonsense?

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

"User replaceable" just means that they have to make it possible, not easy.

Usually legislation is intentionally vague like that, ultimately courts will decide what that really means in practice.

It will end up being just reasonable. Any person can have a reasonable expectation that they will be able to replace the battery with a reasonable amount of time and effort, with readily available tools, with a reasonable amount of guidance.

If you were a judge would you say that it's reasonable to expect people to be able to replace soldered components on their phones?

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 months ago

None of that addresses his point that "removable by the user" is not clearly defined. I didn't see any definition for it in the link you posted.