this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
170 points (96.2% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2218 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Top NATO official Adm. Rob Bauer warned Thursday that a larger war with Russia and other adversaries is a real threat amid the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.

Bauer, chair of the Western security alliance’s Military Committee, said “not everything is going to be hunky dory in the next 20 years.”

“I’m not saying it is going wrong tomorrow, but we have to realize it’s not a given that we are in peace,” he said at a press conference in Brussels. “That’s why we have the plans, that’s why we are preparing for conflict with Russia and the terror groups if it comes to it.”

Bauer emphasized the security alliance is defensive and does not seek conflict or a wider war.

“But if they attack us, we have to be ready,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ULS@lemmy.ml -2 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I was banking on total world collapse within the next 20 years.

[–] LanternEverywhere@kbin.social 18 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Don't bank on it. It's a possibility of course, but it's at least as likely that it doesn't happen, so you should do reasonable preparations for if the society you're living in DOESN'T collapse.

[–] pearable@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Be the change you want to see in the world. Collapse society yourself /s

[–] Sabata11792@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

if the society you're living in DOESN'T collapse.

I honesty can't tell if this is the bad ending or not.

[–] Delta_V@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

In the Cyberpunk 2077 setting, survival is the unhappy ending.

from the soundtrack:

You see, there's no convenient apocalypse
Won't be no vaporizing cloud
Now we're gonna have to soak in what we created - too bad!
Just not in a pleasant, easily resolved, no questions asked, nuclear global happy ending with a big bow on top

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 10 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

from the soundtrack:

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] aew360@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

People have said that in the 1910s, late 1920s, late 1930s, late 1940s all the way up until the early 1990s, and then we started saying it for other reasons like climate change and AI. It’s always possible, but honestly not likely. The end of globalization will have some severe effects across the world like massive famine in countries that keep reproducing with no food security, but I don’t think we should constantly declare the sky is falling when we’ve proven just how resilient the world is in the wake of an all-out pandemic and supply chain crisis

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

From the Russian perspective, the world order already collapsed in 1991.

The problem is: for Romania, Poland, Ukraine, and many other countries, that's when life started to get better. Russia thinks the opposite, they want to return to the time of the Soviet Union.

Nostalgia for the 1980s wouldn't be a "collapse". But... it'd be good for Russia, bad for USA and especially bad for Europe. It would be incredibly unpleasant to Poland, Romania, Moldova, and Ukraine.