this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
69 points (97.3% liked)
Xbox
5284 readers
2 users here now
An Xbox community for Lemmy!
UNIVERSAL XBOX SUBSCRIBE LINK - CLICK HERE
Click this to open this community in your Specific Instance, then click Subscribe
Rules:
- Stay on topic.
- No hate speech.
- No Politics.
- No console wars. We are all gamers.
- No Clickbait
- Be a decent human.
- No piracy talk or links to copywrited content.
QUICK START GUIDE AND RULES:
New to Lemmy?
View the Getting Started Guide
Attributions:
Xbox Logo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:XBOX_logo_2012.svg
Banner : https://www.xbox.com/en-us/wallpapers/
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
"won't be using AI to replace developers"
"We think that AI is something that can help improve certain process in game production, but not replace people"
You can't use AI without replacing people in some aspect. If a developer is using AI to do the job of two people, that second person doesn't get hired. I'm not mad, it's just the way things are going to be now but anyone who says they aren't replacing people with AI is just looking for some good PR. Everything will use AI going forward the toothpaste is out of the tube.
Or you have two much more productive developers... Not as black and white as you make it seem.
Or even just the same developer, but working less hours. Less likely, but possible.
20 years ago I worked for a grocery company that introduced self checkout terminals. Corporate messaging was that no jobs would be lost. They now run 6 self checkouts in most stores with a single clerk managing them.
It may be true that they didn’t directly let anyone go, but even if they just let attrition do the job, those positions are gone and never coming back.