this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
196 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37727 readers
598 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org
gyrfalcon@beehaw.org
rs5th@beehaw.org
Los@beehaw.org
coldredlight@beehaw.org
SemioticStandard@beehaw.org
TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social
remington@beehaw.org
196
The Internet Is Failing The Website Preservation Test (archive.ph)
submitted 1 year ago by Gork@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org
83 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This is something that keeps me worried at night. Unlike other historical artefacts like pottery, vellum writing, or stone tablets, information on the Internet can just blink into nonexistence when the server hosting it goes offline. This makes it difficult for future anthropologists who want to study our history and document the different Internet epochs. For my part, I always try to send any news article I see to an archival site (like archive.ph) to help collectively preserve our present so it can still be seen by others in the future.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] soiling@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

the most important things will be preserved naturally.

I believe this is a fallacy. Things get preserved haphazardly or randomly, and "importance" is relative anyway.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

It is relative, but it only takes one chain of transmission.

AskHistorians on Reddit had an answer about this. Stuff is flimsy but also really easy and cheap to make copies of now.

[–] fckgwrhqq2yxrkt@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

In addition, who decides "importance"? Currently importance seems very tied to profitability, and knowledge is often not profitable.