916
Class War (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] arken@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago

An important detail to notice here is that a user calling themselves kusimulkku is likely to be writing this from Finland. Which may result in an important difference of perspective.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 15 points 5 months ago

Finland is correct. Though I have no idea what sort of situation those other people assumed to warrant such a claim.

[-] Ross_audio@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

There is the danger of manufacturing consent.

https://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/spotlight-primary-source/remember-maine-1898

Raising tensions then using an incident to light the touch paper.

Russian's at the border is one thing.

But the most likely "attack" on the US is going to be much smaller.

Note the Houthis attacking merchant ships. Under a US flag.

There are 2 options

  1. retaliate.

or

  1. tell the ships to go round and use sanctions and other non violent diplomatic tools to resolve the situation.

Option 1 is an escalation.

Option 2 is not.

The US military is is an odd position. I'd defend Ukraine from Russia. I'd defend Palestine from Israel. I'd defend Israel from Palestine.

I wouldn't support an aggressor.

There is a moral obligation to support violence in that it must be a necessary defence.

Joining the US military we've grown up seeing the US as an aggressor continuously. Supporting aggressors, not sanctioning them.

Then with Ukraine there is reluctance to help a defender.

A country that invaded nations at the drop of a hat 20 years ago has a recruitment problem. No surprises there.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago

If Russian troops are crossing the border then it's Russians who have manufactured the consent for violent action to drive them the fuck away.

[-] Ross_audio@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

I agree, but if that's the way the US, or any other NATO country, gets attacked I'll be surprised.

This is not the war that is proposed, it's a series of proxy wars. Just like Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam, and the decades long conflict with Palestine.

Ask if you'll defend yourself, you'll say yes.

Ask if you'll defend others, the answer is usually "it depends".

Ask if you'll go fight in a proxy war which protects largely corporate interests, you'll say no.

Joining the American military is saying yes to all 3. That's the recruitment issue going on there.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago

Well the whole point of NATO is that hopefully Russia wouldn't dare. Let's hope they'll not as fucking dumb and insane as they at times seem. But in any case, it was just a hypothetical. If Russia attacks here, I'd definitely fight in the WW3.

[-] Ross_audio@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

If there ever is a WW3 that can't be dealt with diplomatically, MAD is the result.

Not worth fighting, better to run and hide as the missiles fly.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

Not necessarily. It could be like chemical weapons and WW2. Everyone had them nobody wanted to start using them. But in any case, I just offered a scenario where I'd be fighting. It's not necessarily the most likely one.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

If Russia attacks the US, our government would try to use that as a recruitment tool, and would probably succeed.

Meanwhile the majority of us would be cheering on the Alaskan citizens that are armed for wildlife that would stop a T-70 in its tracks, to say nothing of the poor Russian conscripts.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago

Nobody look up what Finland was doing in the 1930s.

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago
[-] shottymcb@lemm.ee 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You need to be clearer about what point you're trying to make or the reader has to choose for you. What I'm getting is

Finnish Great Grandpa did some bad shit, so whatever Russia is doing now is ok

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

The current elections in Finland are advancing a large number of far-right ethno-nationalist party leaders. Even the relationship between the Finns and Ukrainians is strained as a result. Case in point Finland refusing to extradite a Russian neo-Nazi terrorist to the Ukraine.

The strain of Finnish white nationalism that's been cultivated in the country for the last twenty years isn't strictly anti-Russian. It is far more centered around Finnish ethnic supremacy and the need to reassert itself as a regional power.

this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
916 points (95.9% liked)

Political Memes

4614 readers
2686 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS