"Here's a four hour video where I explain that the trans-coded character that trans people identify with and the writers explicitly say is trans really isn't, because glorious Nippon does not have the same understanding of trans people."

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

Bridget?

[–] squirrel@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Biscuit?

[–] A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Bucket?

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 10 months ago

Basket?

[–] cosmicrose@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

My beloved Brisket?

[–] flamingos@ukfli.uk 9 points 10 months ago

Lily from Zombieland, maybe?

[–] Jorgelino@lemmy.ml 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I mean... When it comes to "glorious Nippon" i sort of get it, to a degree.

If you still find yourself being properly represented a character then more power to you, but a lot of times the addition of trans characters to anime is less due to respect and more fetishization. I would hardly call japan progressive for lusting over trans women while also calling them the T slur.

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago

The eastern vision of trans people is definitely different. The thing that gets me is that the chuds try to argue it with a western look, which makes no sense if you consider you are more likely to see a trans person than a gay one in a japanese game.