this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2024
417 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3058 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Masterblaster@kbin.social 11 points 9 months ago (3 children)

i, for one, would love to see conservative states get spanked into submission like they did 150 years ago. they need to learn to shut their fucking mouths and do as they're told.

[–] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (4 children)

You're aware hundreds of thousands were killed during the Civil War, right?

I, for one, would love to see a resolution without bloodshed.

[–] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

One side of the political spectrum has proven that they are willing to kill to get what they want.

Not sure how it will turn out but there's already bloodshed.

The question is how much bloodshed are we willing to see before we do something about it.

[–] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

That's precisely the reason a peaceful outcome should be reached. Rather than advocating for an extreme escalation in violence to "own" the other side.

[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I would love to see our national problems solved peacefully but the same republicans pushing for civil war in Texas are the same people who also have been obstructing Congress from doing the will of the people for the last 15 years. They're the same people who tried to overthrow the government when Trump lost to Biden.

Have you been living under a rock, or just idealistic? It might be time to get a bag ready.

[–] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (2 children)

If advocating against a civil war makes me idealistic, then so be it.

Anyone who thinks a civil war is necessary and appropriate is ignorant of the cost of war. They should honestly ask themselves if they would truly back up their words with actions, or do they only hold those feelings behind the safety of a screen.

[–] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Right, just context

[–] skulblaka@startrek.website 1 points 9 months ago

If I'm going to get shot at by some AR-toting bigot, or I'm going to get shot at by an AR-toting bigot that I'm returning fire on, I'll take the second choice 10/10 times. These people have proven that they are willing and able to use violence to accomplish their goals. Waiting calmly for them to do so is a recipe for dying without anything to show for it.

[–] Masterblaster@kbin.social -4 points 9 months ago

we're dooming untold generations yet to be born if we don't take quick decisive action. i'd sacrifice 10 million to save 20 billion.

[–] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

“The tree of liberty must be refreshed with the blood of patriots from time to time.”

I’m quoting this as though I’m brave enough to go die in some urban street combat.

[–] Masterblaster@kbin.social 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

me too. spoiler: there isn't one.

[–] bhmnscmm@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

I dearly hope cooler heads than yours prevail.

[–] downhomechunk@midwest.social 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'd rather see them secede and watch how quickly Texas and Florida get tired of having to carry the rest of the red states without federal money from blue states. We'd be fine or perhaps better of without them, but I don't think the reverse is true.

[–] Railing5132@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Texas can't carry shit. I don't think Florida can either, but am not 100% sure.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Florida can carry an alligator or two

[–] NightAuthor@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Buuut that’s not how a republic works.

[–] Masterblaster@kbin.social -5 points 9 months ago

not worried about words. i'm more concerned with results.