this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
454 points (97.7% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3730 readers
818 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ **8. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@jawa21@startrek.website for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Whelks_chance@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago (5 children)

It's odd that people are against monopolies, generally speaking, but for streaming services we would prefer if there were a few giant companies which owned it all.

I'm not disagreeing with the above, just thought it was curious.

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago

Compare Movie/TV-show streaming to the Music streaming industry. Spotify/Tidal/Apple/Amazon all offer access to the same music (more or less). They compete on features/quality/apps/prices/etc. They don't compete based on their exclusive libraries. Somehow the music industry can survive in that model. Video streaming needs to do the same. Stop the exclusivity. This way, monopolies are not needed in video streaming.

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

People aren't clamoring for a monopoly, they are asking for interoperability. I didn't need a single VHS rental store to be the only place I could get Ernest Scared Stupid, but I did need to be able to get Ernest Goes to Jail at every VHS rental store.

[–] Vathsade@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

A mother's love

[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

All we'd really need to do that is just make it a law that contracts aren't exclusive.

If shows were sold to multiple streaming services legally, then those services would compete based on the actual service they offer, and not the content they have.

In other words, make streaming services the customers for shows, instead of individuals, and then let people be their customers.

As it is, a streaming service is pretty comparable to a car dealership.

[–] invertedspear@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

That’s not all we’d need to do though. Too many cases of the content rights holders also owning a streaming service means they’d just not sign any contracts. Disney, paramount, NBC, hell even Netflix owns content. We need to also break up so that right holders can’t also control the means of distribution.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

No, my problem is that we have this system where each piece of content is its own monopoly. That exclusivity means that people need to use a specific service to access that content.

The whole "I wish it was all on one platform" isn't really wishing for only a single platform to exist, but wishing that one platform could host all of the content. Ideally, there would be multiple ones doing this and differentiating themselves from each other in some way and, well, competing on their platform itself rather than "I paid a bunch of money so that you have to come here if you want to see anything Marvel."

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think two or three viable platforms was kind of the sweet spot. It's not all dominated by one, but I also don't have to shop around and subscribe to five different things if I want to get what I want legally. But you're right that it's a sticky issue that just doesn't seem to have a good answer.

[–] IronCorgi@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

The solution is mandatory licensing at fixed rates for media that is no longer under production. Make it so the only way to have exclusive content is to commit to continuing that content.