this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
491 points (95.2% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54443 readers
261 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

this contradiction always confused me. either way the official company is "losing a sale" and not getting the money, right?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 27 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Legally speaking you don't own the digital files, you have a license but you don't actually own it.

[–] MxM111@kbin.social 10 points 9 months ago (5 children)

So, why can’t I buy and sell license?

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Ehhh they’re technically wrong. You don’t own the media with physical formats either. There’s just nothing they can do about it if they want it out of your home.

[–] Oka@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

In a way, NFTs were supposed to solve this.

[–] Godort@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

I believe there was a recent EU ruling that mandated that this must be allowed.

I'm not sure of the details, however.

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

You literally can. Check out kinguin

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 1 points 9 months ago

Often, licence agreements stipulate that they are not transferable and thus you have contractually agreed not to resell them. To what extent this is enforceable is... contentious. Different courts have struggled with the topic and have ruled both directions on the issue.

Copyright law as written was not designed for immaterial goods in any way, and the DMCA has done little to improve that. So effectively the judicial branch is in limbo. Corporate America is content to leave the confusion as is. They can just adopt an interpretation of the law that is maximally beneficial to them, and consumers generally don't have the resources to challenge that interpretation.

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago

That is no different with CDs, DVDs, etc. It’s written on all of them. It’s a limited license, which is why you can’t host screenings and charge people with your physical media.