this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
65 points (86.5% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54609 readers
488 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Just saw on Titus Tech Talk that torrents are last decade, and newsgroups is where it's at for this stuff. Of course he didn't elaborate, so I need some help here.

What is he talking about, and what are these groups that can I ~~enter~~ er, avoid?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 39 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Back in the day, people shared files on usenet news, which was similar to the forums you're seeing on Lemmy or Reddit.

You'd take a file, image, video, whatever, and turn it into text via a program called uuencode.

Text size posting limits often meant having to split the image into multiple text pieces all marked (1/34, 2/34, etc.)

The person downloading the file would then need to stitch all the pieces together, in order, making one large text file, then use uudecode to turn it back into a usable file.

Here's a sample of what a uuencoded file looked like:

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)

From a user aspect: nowadays all that is burried in/handed by the usenet client you use.

Downloading from usenet is very similar to torrenting in that you receive an index file (.nzb) that is effectively equivalent to a torrent file. You pass that to your usenet client, and it'll handle downloading each of the parts, called articles, then stitching them together into the actual file shares. (while even recovering missing/corrupted data via added parity data)

The big difference is you're downloading each of these articles from whichever usenet providers you've configured; instead of from random individual peers discovered through public/private trackers.

Usenet providers usually offer more consistent and faster speeds, typically saturating my disk write speed; where as torrent peers are often slow or unreliable in comparison. Also as it's a standard tls connection between you and a private service, and you don't have to re-upload the data you download; you're not exposed to copyright claimants and don't need a vpn.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 6 points 9 months ago

That's cool. I never knew about that!