Technology

59349 readers

5340 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

1394

Elon Musk and company take @x handle from its original user. He got zero dollars for it. (mashable.com)

submitted 1 year ago by SELECTstarFROMreddit@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world

289 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] venorathebarbarian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I do not get how you're so confused.

It's not that he was "entitled" to money, it's that money would have made taking his handle less of a dick move. Elon is a multi billionaire, he could have thrown a tens of thousands of dollars at this dude and had a good PR situation for his generosity, and not even noticed the dip in his bank account. Instead the story is that he's an asshole who treats his users like shit if they have something he wants.

So here we are, calling him an asshole. How is that confusing?

[–] anteaters@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not confused and I agree that he's an asshole. I still think its dumb to expect to get paid by Twitter when they take over your handle. Musk is not about good PR or good will, Hwang is lucky he wasn't called a pedo by Musk - yet. And there are indeed people here who believe they are entitled to compensation and think they own their stupid Twitter name. How is that confusing?