this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
424 points (96.1% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3040 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

President Joe Biden on Sunday ticked through a list of reasons he says a second Donald Trump presidency would be a “nightmare” for the country as he urged Nevada Democrats to vote for him in the state’s presidential primary this week and for his party at large in November.

Biden opened a campaign swing with a fundraiser where he focused on Trump’s ample history of provocative statements — his description of Jan. 6 rioters as “hostages,” his musing about a former top military officer deserving execution, his branding of fallen soldiers as “suckers” and “losers,” his wish to be a Day One “dictator,” his vow to supporters that “I am your retribution,” and more.

Then it was on to a community center in a predominantly Black section of Las Vegas, where he told his crowd of several hundred that “you’re the reason we’ll make Donald Trump a loser again.”

Biden said the stakes were huge when he took on Trump in 2020 — “what made America America, I thought, was at risk’ — and they are even larger now as a likely rematch looms.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Poxlox@lemmy.world 44 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think he's trying to get swing and less like to vote votes, not appeal to the loony party

[–] MyPornViewingAccount@lemmy.world 34 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Youre correct, this message isnt for the GQP, this message is for those that dont want to go out and vote

[–] Szymon@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Enormous divisions are showing within the GOP as the unreasonable forces are gaining ground, but the old guard knows how insane and fascist this path is.

That part of the GOP is sizable and realizing they don't need to follow along the same path as the fascists. Give those people a soft landing, not a harsh criticism, and they'll join your decision that they don't want the future presented to them.

[–] MyPornViewingAccount@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (2 children)

What a fancy way to say, "please dont punish us for spending the last 8 years supporting a rapist who our members of the House voted to support in an attempt to overthrow democracy!"

[–] Poxlox@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Punish? Where'd that come from

[–] MyPornViewingAccount@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Youre assuming punish in the most direct sense of the word.

Im not talking about beating people in the streets.

[–] Poxlox@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Yeah I didn't take issue with the definition or literal use, it's that what that person wrote doesn't correspond with what you said with any interpretation of "punish".

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe 3 points 9 months ago

His point is that they FEAR punishment. 🤦

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.cafe 2 points 9 months ago

His point is that they FEAR punishment. 🤦

[–] Szymon@lemmy.ca -4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Are you interested in a better future for everyone, or punishing the spectrum of those who you feel were led to make decisions you don't agree with?

You can't have both.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

How can we trust they won’t turn around and do it again immediately?

Like I agree in principle with you, but I have no trust left

[–] Szymon@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The point is to wear each other out. They're just people, talk to them and give them education and safe spaces to discuss ideas.. it's not the fair idea, but it's the idea that breaks the system of hate keeping us at each other's throats, too busy with an ideological war to fight the class war that'll free society.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

If you think there exists a "safe" space to discuss fascism, and overthrowing democracy, then you really have no concept of what's happening in this country right now.

Last time we went easy on traitors, they built memorials to their traitorous scum leaders and created the "lost cause" concept that is ruining our country to this day.

[–] Szymon@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

The safe space needs to exist for them to bring it up and not feel threatened into defending their position, but allowing them to question their beliefs in a way to helps them see the hippocracy of their positions.

A black guy got dozens of KKK members to stop being racist by talking to them. I'd argue that his methods can be utilized here.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

Kind of like that we did with the south after the Civil War?

How did Reconstruction end up going again...?

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago