this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2024
633 points (97.3% liked)

politics

18821 readers
4888 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 97 points 7 months ago (6 children)

The United States has maintained longstanding support to NATO. Most recently, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2024, enacted on December 22, 2023, prohibits the President from unilaterally withdrawing from NATO without approval of a two-third Senate super-majority or an act of Congress.[71] This bill was a response to Donald Trump's repeated expressions of interest in withdrawing from the organization.[72][73]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Withdrawal_from_NATO#United_States

That link also claims the Greens want out of NATO, so I guess they see eye-to-eye with Trump on that one? Honestly, it makes me less likely to support the Greens now that I know that.

[–] Heresy_generator@kbin.social 99 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The Green Party in the US is just an extension of the Kremlin aimed at peeling votes away from Democrats in key races.

[–] PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world 56 points 7 months ago

The US Greens are largely subsidized by Republican funders, and Green presidential candidates have been dinner guests of Putin. The US Greens aren’t an independent environmentalist party but are a GOP stalking horse.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 31 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Oh boy, they think Ukraine should also negotiate with Putin under a cease fire: https://www.gp.org/proposal_1155_gpus_calls_for_ceasefire_to_end_ukraine_war

But apparently they advocate pacifist ideas. No real foundation in reality.

[–] trajekolus@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Pretty hard for me to see a difference between a pacifist and a tankie

[–] lemmingrad@thelemmy.club -2 points 7 months ago

Is this irony? oO

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

The Greens haven't been the greens since Nader.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Does that apply just for 2024?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Good question and I do not know. And my searching isn't coming up with a good answer either.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I believe it’s forever, unless found unconstitutional or congress changes and passes a replacement.

The 2024 part of the Bill name is just so you know which fiscal bill it is.

Edited for typo.