this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
264 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43944 readers
947 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Nemo@midwest.social 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Not really. Almost nobody sets out trying to be late.

[โ€“] Damage@feddit.it 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But if you're constantly late it means that you don't care about wasting other people's time... Kinda assholeish

[โ€“] booptoot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago

Well, youd be surprised... I definitely know people that leave the house past the time they were supposed to be somewhere with a nonchalant attitude "theyll wait, its nbd"

[โ€“] SeeJayEmm@lemmy.procrastinati.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm sure someone does but sure. But there's a difference between someone who's not trying to be late and someone who actually tries not to be late.

Someone who's habitually late can't be bothered to even try to respect your time. To me that's a bit assholish.

[โ€“] Nemo@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

There's a skill component, too. A lot of ya are trying not to be late, trying to be early, even, but just are really bad at it.

[โ€“] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is that different to not trying to be on time?

[โ€“] Nemo@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, almost all of us are trying to be on time. But that's balanced by other concerns, like making sure we leave the house prepared, and taking public transit, and the needs of the people we're leaving as well as the people we're going to. There isn't always an "earlier" we can leave by, and not everyone is in charge of their own schedule.

[โ€“] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago

None of what you're describing is "not trying to be on time".

You're describing an "all" situation using very specific events. You're also describing a poorly planned arrangement if the time you're expected to arrive at something is not realistic for you to be there. That's different to someone not trying to be on time to something that they otherwise could be and aren't.