this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
295 points (99.7% liked)

Science Memes

10897 readers
3577 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CookieJarObserver@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And? Do you want to test on humans or what?

[–] MildlyArdvark@feddit.dk 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That’s irrelevant. The comment was about the choice of words. It’s simply false to say the mice sacrificed themselves. If anything they were sacrificed by us humans.

[–] aeternum@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

there is no need to use animal testing anymore. There are supercomputers that are much more realistic than testing this horseshit on defenceless animals that are a completely different species to us.

[–] AlolanYoda@mander.xyz 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I work in a related field and while I don't know anything about supercomputers being more realistic, there is a movement to eliminate animal testing and instead use organ-on-chip models - still using cells, but in vitro. The advantage is not only that you eliminate animal suffering, but also that you can use human cells, so your tests are much more quickly applicable to humans. In fact, in a far away future, you could even test with your cells and see how a specific treatment affects you. Super interesting stuff!

[–] aeternum@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

here's hoping that takes off and we can stop abusing defenceless animals.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As much as this freaks me out in an imagination-run-wild sci-fi wasteland way, I WISH we had tech like that. It would help so much with preventative medicine.

[–] Tomassci@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

There's also the idea of organoids for studying development without having to study the entire organism.

[–] QuinceDaPence@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Computers can run a model...but you have to have real world data to create and improve the model. Plus there's always the chance the model is wrong or has some inaccuracy in it.

[–] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A model is more accurate than a mouse, when it comes to weather medication is safe for a human. A huge chunks of trials that passed the non-human animal testing stages fail when applied to humans.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Do you have a source for this? Curious. My impressions were we are trying to get there but have a way to go yet. Brains, etc. have just been mapped in the last year and are far from perfect. This is the ultimate goal, though. My university requires you to go through an ethics board before you can touch living things.

I wish my university did that back in the day. Sounds like a good programme.