this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
1334 points (99.9% liked)

Technology

59392 readers
4195 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm happy to see this being noticed more and more. Google wants to destroy the open web, so it's a lot at stake.

Google basically says "Trust us". What a joke.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dan@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What’s the “web protocol”? Are you talking about HTTP?

[–] TheYear2525@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Seems from their response to me asking the same thing, they mean browser engines, not anything to do with any of the protocols involved.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wish I'd said "web standards" instead.

[–] dan@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You mean HTML, CSS, JavaScript, etc?

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Including those but also all specifications defined by the W3C. I would post other examples here but I'm out of my depth.

[–] dan@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok well, the modern web technology ecosystem is incredibly featureful and flexible, it allows a huge array of options for building rich interactive applications, all delivered to your browser on-demand in a few seconds.

Sure some of the technologies involved aren’t perfect (and I challenge you to find any system that feature-rich that doesn’t have a few dark corners), but there really no alternative option that comes close in terms of flexibility and maturity.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Adding features endlessly, heedless of danger of the inate security issue from the complexity, makes for an uncompetative and ultimatly unsustainable ecosystem.

The alternative I believe in is to use seperare apps for each segmented feature (the dedicated video player plays the video, the browser merely fetches it).

[–] dan@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Web standards are public, discussed openly, heavily scrutinised (including by security researchers) and available for any browser developer to implement.

You want to go back to the days of Realplayer, Acrobat Reader, Flash, etc, when individual companies made their own privately developed closed source apps?