People bringing up the 100 corporations are usually calling for regulations on them, and the "you're the ones buying the goods" people are usually calling for Personal Responsibility and Voting With Your Wallet.

[–] 1stTime4MeInMCU@mander.xyz 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It’s possible to both think those companies should be regulated and that people are doing almost nothing personally to help, including electing people to enact those policies. For most people I talk to the “but 100 corps” is a total deflection of personal responsibility. This crisis will not be solved without a good heaping helping of both personal responsibility and aggressive government regulation. If nothing else because that aggressive regulation will never pass into law unless people acknowledge their personal responsibility and are willing to accept the sacrifices that will come with it.

[–] Aesthesiaphilia@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This crisis will not be solved without a good heaping helping of both personal responsibility and aggressive government regulation.

100%. People usually argue for one to the exclusion of the other but we need both.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Only one actually works.

You can do personal responsibility alone all you want. Nobody will join you. Government regulation affects everyone.

Selling people on personal responsibility is what the oil companies want, because they know it doesn't work. It gives you the chance to be high and mighty, while nobody else reduces their consumption, so their profits stay the same.

Definitely consume less if you can, but don't delude yourself into thinking that individual actions in reducing personal consumption achieve anything. Go out there and vote for politicians who propose better climate policies, maybe assassinate some oil, gas and coal company execs, etc.

[–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml -1 points 2 years ago

Not to mention that we could organise for every one of the seven or eight billion people on the planet to take 'personal responsibility' and it would still leave 70%+ of emissions untouched. Not even close to where we need to be.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml -2 points 2 years ago

In the US, unless you are willing to vote third party, you don't get the choice to vote for Anti-Capitalist politicians. And there are millions of liberals waiting in line to scold you for not voting for the parties of Capital.