this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2024
424 points (93.8% liked)

World News

39023 readers
2321 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That would be the end of Russia and they know it.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It would also be the end of NATO and probably the rest of the world. That's why it's called mutually assured destruction. But it seems like recently policy makers are forgetting that

[–] efstajas@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (3 children)

That's exactly the point. Why would Russia send nukes if it knows it'll be destroyed in retribution?

[–] EffortlessEffluvium@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

Because assholes gonna asshole

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

They know they can get a few off if they sacrafice a few Russian cities. Which Putin does not care about. He'll watch them be vaporized if he thinks he can land a death blow on any major western powers.

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why not just launch them now then?

[–] aidan@lemmy.world -4 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The poster said he would sacrifice a few cities to take down a western power. He could do that now.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world -3 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The criteria given by the other poster for Putin to use nukes is currently met. So using their logic, he should launch them now. I'm asking why he doesn't.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

The criteria given by the other poster for Putin to use nukes is currently met. So using their logic, he should launch them now.

Necessary criteria isn't the same as motivating criteria.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -2 points 8 months ago

No the criterion is a war between NATO and Russia. That criterion is not met.

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Yep depends on how much fear and hatred Putin has for the west and how much he actually cares about his own people.

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago

"Russia" as a whole wouldn't want that. But there's only one guy in charge of everything.