88
submitted 4 months ago by Today@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Anyone registered to vote can choose a Republican or Democratic ballot. Many of the people on the Democratic ballot (in my area) are running unopposed, so it was a good opportunity to try to get the least crazy people on the November ballot. Also, the republican ballot has 13 propositions that are not on the Democratic one, so that's your only chance to have a say in those (and IMO they are really really bad!)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zitronensaft@feddit.de 38 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

For the Texans specifically, I would like to add that Ken Paxton is trying to primary Presiding Judge Sharon Keller, Judge Barbara Hervey and Judge Michelle Slaughter of the Criminals Court of Appeals which is the highest level criminal appeals court in Texas. He is upset with them because they wouldn’t allow him to pursue voter fraud cases unilaterally, his office has to get permission from a local prosecutor now.

Ken Paxton has also put a lot of money into trying to primary state legislators who voted to impeach him, that is why so many incumbents do have challengers right now. Definitely look up your local races before going in to vote.

In case anyone is out of the loop on Attorney General Ken Paxton, I have one more link about the charges of securities fraud he was indicted on eight years ago. The case is finally going to trial in April.

[-] wjrii@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

My district has an R incumbent getting primaried by a Paxton shill but... I just can't. I already held my nose and voted for some school board people in a general who are way to the right of me, but were obviously less crazy than their opponents, and fortunately it worked out. The incumbent here is barely any less crazy than the challenger, and shit, Paxton is not even on an ideological vendetta, but rather a personally corrupt one that is way more damaging to the GOP's ability to get things done (which are always bad when not utterly mundane). Abbott's obsession with vouchers that are always opposed by football-lovin' rural republicans who don't want their schools to close and their towns to die is the one that's so baffling to me. I can pick through it and guess that it comes down to donations from people who stand to benefit from a private school industrial complex fueled by tax dollars, but it's an odd hill to die on.

The GOP is toxic, and the Texas GOP doubly so. My adding to the number of people voting in a Dem primary will have to do.

[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

Same. Thanks to who’s who can stomach it, but I’m not one of them. I used the League of Women Voters Vote411 project to research everyone on my ballot, and there were a couple races that were difficult because I liked multiple people running and had a hard time choosing just one.

Can’t see that happening in a race between two or more R’s.

[-] Today@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

I spent a couple of hours researching and all I got out of it was feeling like I needed to take a shower. Finally, I looked up the true Texas project, printed off their recommendations, and voted opposite those.

this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
88 points (96.8% liked)

politics

18073 readers
4353 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS