this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
2811 points (99.9% liked)

Privacy

40371 readers
334 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Commodification of everything you think off Past/Present/Future.

https://fosstodon.org/@jimsalter/110441094176772187

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] noodlejetski@geddit.social 216 points 2 years ago (8 children)
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 104 points 2 years ago

This was the original cyberpunk-transhumanist message. Not "cybernetics will destroy your soul" but "corporations own your body, or worse parts of your body"

[–] Helldiver_M@kbin.social 72 points 2 years ago

That's a new hell-on-eath I wasn't aware of. Yikes.

[–] Coeus@coeus.sbs 70 points 2 years ago (2 children)

A good argument for open source

[–] programmer_belch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 65 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] oce@jlai.lu 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] programmer_belch@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] QuazarOmega@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] sulgoth@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Occasionally just firmware.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Sometimes software, sometimes hardware.. it's the new semi-ware!

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Lol, flaccidware

[–] manned_meatball@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And even if open source doesn't fit their business model for any reason, there should be regulations that force these companies to open source everything in any situation that they stop offering support.

[–] DetectiveSanity@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I've meditated about this a while now! Imagine the amount of electronic waste produced by planned obsolescence! You have a phone, TV, car and much more that could be diagnosed, repaired and reused for same or all different use cases.

All those phones that still are running LineageOS perfectly fine that could be used by the elderly who need not have much more than basic communication.

[–] Frigidlollipop@lemmy.ml 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Terrifying. No government bailout for improving people's life quality...

[–] Nitrate55@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No, they're far too busy using taxpayer money to bail out banks and businesses that are "too big to fail".

[–] fades@beehaw.org 17 points 2 years ago

Wow that made me so fucking uncomfortable, from the serious adverse affects requiring surgical intervention, the company trying to shout down negativity and just leaving these poor people to continue suffering….

It’s all so horrid, I can’t imagine the stress and impact

[–] CAPSLOCKFTW@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Thanks for sharing.

[–] QuazarOmega@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Well that's fucking bleak, at least I got a good chuckle out of this

NPM’s novel implant for drug delivery.

So that's how they keep JavaScript devs hooked!

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

3 years later they’ll end the support

I don't think that's a fair characterization - it sounds like they ran out of money and the company that bought all their assets didn't maintain support. In that company's defense, it's really hard to maintain support for something when you've bought the IP but you don't have any of the institutional knowledge.

[–] sciawp@lemm.ee 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Maybe it’s a hot take but if you are giving life-altering treatments, and your company goes under, you should open-source everything

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Would that even be legal? The company has obligations to its creditors and shareholders; simply giving away potentially valuable intellectual property right before going under seems to violate those obligations. And it's the sort of violation for which someone might be personally held liable.

I'm not claiming that a company can never open-source anything, but rather than they have to have a plausible business case for doing so. And I don't see a plausible business (as opposed to humanitarian) case here... But I'm not a corporate lawyer, just someone interested in this sort of thing.

Edit: there's also the FDA to consider. If you make medical devices and you want to release the source code, you probably need to demonstrate that it's safe for users to reprogram their devices (and it's not safe).

[–] noodlejetski@geddit.social 18 points 2 years ago

regardless of the the reason, people ended up with non-functional eye implants.