this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
15 points (89.5% liked)

Lemmy Apps

5485 readers
62 users here now

A home for discussion of Lemmy apps and tools for all platforms.

RULES:

An extensive list of Lemmy apps is available here:

LemmyApps.com

or lemmyapps.netlify.app

Visit our partner Communities!

Lemmy Plugins and Userscripts is a great place to enhance the Lemmy browsing experience. !plugins@sh.itjust.works

Lemmy Integrations is a community about all integrations with the lemmy API. Bots, Scripts, New Apps, etc. !lemmy_integrations@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Lemmy Bots and Tools is a place to discuss and show off bots, tools, front ends, etc. you’re making that relate to lemmy. !lemmy_dev@programming.dev

Lemmy App Development is a place for Lemmy builders to chat about building apps, clients, tools and bots for the Lemmy platform. !lemmydev@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
15
Old Apps Discussion thread (lemmy.world)
submitted 8 months ago by gedaliyah@lemmy.world to c/lemmyapps@lemmy.world
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

How should our community treat out-of-date and abandoned Apps?

Sometimes a dev is away for an extended period of time, then returns to development. Sometimes an app is officially abandoned but still functions well. Sometimes an app may be under active development but not yet compatible with the latest version of Lemmy.

Should these apps be excluded from our Apps list? Which ones? What criteria should we use? Should we maintain a list of "Old Apps" for posterity, as a code database, etc?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is visible in the current pinned post, and apps are sorted (at the moment) by most recently updated. Do you think this is enough? Should we leave apps on the list indefinitely and let users make their own judgements?

[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

i would leave them up even if abandoned so if a seeker stumbles upon one and is curious about it, they can know it is known and dismissable, rather than submitting it for inclusion on the list.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Or maybe even fork it

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 3 points 8 months ago

That was my thought, too.