680

Valve announced a replacement feature for both Family Sharing and Family View. Currently in beta.

Features:

  • up to 5 members
  • game sharing
  • parental controls
    • allow access to appropriate games
    • restrict access to the Steam Store, Community or Friends Chat
    • set playtime limits (hourly/daily)
    • view playtime reports
    • approve or deny requests from child accounts for additional playtime or feature access (temporary or permanent)
    • recover a child's account if they lost their password
  • child purchase requests
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Kedly@lemm.ee 158 points 3 months ago

Its shit like this why I want to smack the "B-BUT STEAMS MONOPOLY" types who claim Steam does nothing with its 30%. Steam is one of the only companies out their in our late stage capitalist society that actually does things for its customer base without being forced to. We have digital refunds, completely remappable controllers, a linux operating system and portable computer that functions as a console when you dont want to use it as a computer, the only DRM in the world that doesnt actively suck, built in mod database/support, VR, official early access marketplace support (I know it has its issues), user game reviews with multiple sorting options, and thats everything I can currently think of. Steam is not only the only company I dont actively hate (Ok, I kind of like Costco too), vut I actually quite like Steam as a company.

[-] RisingSwell@lemmy.world 53 points 3 months ago

Digital refunds isn't them being good, it's them getting sued by Australia.

[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 43 points 3 months ago

They could have made it an AU only feature, though, and didn't, to their credit.

[-] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 12 points 3 months ago

Because I'm pretty sure EU was next in line to slap them in the face for not offering refunds.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 months ago

and every other company would wait for every country to threaten them before enabling it there, because that's 5 more months of extra profit!

[-] Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I think it’s also just generally a good thing for them. I’m way more hesitant to buy stuff from humble and fanatical because I can’t return stuff, so I rather pay a bit more to get it through steam.

[-] catsarebadpeople@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

I too hate everything that's not completely perfect in every way

[-] RisingSwell@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Ah yes, my comment openly states I hate steam because it isn't perfect. It's definitely written in there.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 43 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

without being forced to. We have digital refunds

Small nitpick, but it’s funny that you specifically listed their refunds first. Because they were forced into that. Some may remember how comically awful Steam’s customer support used to be. It was genuinely horrible, with resolution turnaround times measured in days and weeks instead of minutes or hours. There was no instant messaging or automated system; You had to email a sketchy email address, then wait days or weeks for them to finally respond. And chances were good that the response would basically boil down to “lul git fuckd loser, sux 2 b u”

Europe started pushing for them to be more customer friendly, because their refunds in particular were breaching some local European laws. In order to keep operating in Europe, they revamped their refund process entirely and recommitted to better customer service going forwards. But they only started the entire refund revamp in 2015 because they were going to be pushed out of European markets if they failed to comply.

[-] Kedly@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

I brought it up because until Steam did it NO digital game marketplace had refunds. Whether or not they got sued, Steam led the way

[-] Drigo@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 months ago

And its also frecking 10 years ago now they added refunds. It's like people like using "thet got sued to add it" as some sorta "gotcha" that steam is bad, I don't get some people

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 28 points 3 months ago

Don't forget private games, it's a win-win because customers can buy games they don't want to show to their friends and Valve get more money because they get more people buying those ~~embarrassing~~ ~~awesome~~ games.

[-] Kedly@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

RIGHT! I FORGOT ABOUT THAT ONE

[-] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 19 points 3 months ago

Don’t forget Steam Link! It’s one of my favourite features. You’re not even really tethered to any particular device to play your games since so many devices support the app. I play games that are single-player “console” style games in my lounge room for comfort and Steam Link means I can use my very good PC instead of buying into yet another console generation.

[-] DingoBilly@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

This stuff is great.

But ignoring all the real issues with Steam is stupid. Its people like you that require others to point out all the issues with Valve and how it won't last forever.

[-] trigonated@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

And it's bizarre that some of them seem to get angry when someone else points the issues out.

[-] The_Lopen@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Looks weird from my side too, when someone starts frothing at the mouth about monopolies when steam is so much as mentioned.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] rdri@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago
[-] Kedly@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago

Fair point. I interact with their storefront more than I've played their games, so my brain jumps to the word Steam before it does Valve.

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

A monopoly is a monopoly is a monopoly.

The vast majority of games you pay for on Steam can be taken from you in a couple of clicks from a Valve employee. The second there's a chance in management everything can go out the window very quickly because their position is ripe for abuse.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 9 points 3 months ago

What happens when the leadership or ownership changes hands?

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

He's already said that he'd sink the company before he'd sell it. I believe him... it's not like he's not already rolling in money. What else do you offer him?

Edit: sink in this context being releasing all the drm.

[-] sdcSpade@lemmy.zip 20 points 3 months ago

The man's not gonna live forever, ownership changing is a matter of time, not raw money. And I dread that time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

The other part of the question remains however, what happens when leadership changes, even supposing no sale of the company?

[-] Kedly@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

We go back to piracy. Easy enough

Edit: Wait. Do you guys think we use Steam because we HAVE to? GoG exists bros, we're using Steam because we prefer it. If Steam goes to shit we'll just stop using it

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 8 points 3 months ago

Yeah I love how they pioneered marketing gambling and loot boxes to children, so visionary

[-] Spedwell@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

CSGO cases pulled $1 billion revenue in 2023. The steam store brought in $8.5 billion in that same year. That's a 30% cut of all sales traffic on steam vs. in-game loot crates on a single title.

Loot boxes pull insane numbers. And yes they exploit children and problem gamblers. Love to see so many Valve fans downvote you :/

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Valve can be attributed with saving PC gaming. When people were terrified of buying “digital only” games on this fugly client called Steam—which only had Valve games and a few no name indies—the PC gaming shelves in places like Walmart and EB Games looked like a clearance section. Just a hodgepodge of games in no particular order, worn out looking boxes of new games picked up and put back down, meanwhile the PlayStation and Xbox walls flourished and even GameCube got more love from a merchandising standpoint.

Now we trust Valve with our digital libraries the way we’d trust a bank with our money. They’ve earned that trust, and I can’t say the same for Sony or Nintendo which are happy to charge you repeatedly for the same game. Microsoft actually does a pretty good job of making your old games still playable in some form, so Kudos to them.

So will we be surprised when Epic Games Store goes tits up? No. Will we care when we lose all our games? No, they were all free. Should we support Valve as long as they continue to be the champions of PC gaming? You better if you care about where it goes.

[-] Kedly@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

100% These idiots shit on Valve like the PC marketplace wouldnt be infinitely worse without them. If you truly care about the PC sphere getting better, shit on Valves lack of competition, dont try to tear down the best example we have. That being said I'm hesitant to say ONLY option as at this point GoG and Itch are passable competition, even if what they provide is TINY compared to what Valve has brought the PC Gaming Sphere

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

who claim Steam does nothing with its 30%

I don't think that's the argument against it. Just that it's inordinately high. But Valve is a corporation so not unexpected.

[-] Rinox@feddit.it 6 points 3 months ago

The 30% it's always been the standard though, so not just Valve. That figure comes from retail, where 30-50% is still standard practice. You could argue that retail has higher costs, therefore needs the higher cut, but when Valve created Steam, they probably went with what worked.

What I really hate about Steam and all online shops, is that you can't resell something you purchased second hand. If I can resell my physical copy of a game or movie, I should be able to do the same with the digital version. Also the fact that they can remove access to the product you bought whenever they want. In my opinion, we need a law that specifies that what you buy is yours, and you get to do whatever you want with it, even if the manufacturer doesn't like it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MonkeMischief 2 points 3 months ago

Also catalog filtering. I wish GoG had a search filter half as good as Steam's!

load more comments (9 replies)
this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
680 points (99.3% liked)

Games

30510 readers
207 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS