this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
358 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3449 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump has until Monday to come up with the money.

New York Attorney General Letitia James has urged an appeals court to ignore Donald Trump’s latest effort to worm his way out of paying the $464 million disgorgement from his bank fraud trial.

On Wednesday, an attorney for James told the court that Trump’s claims could not be trusted since they were based on sworn statements by Alan Garten, general counsel at the Trump Organization, and Gary Giulietti, one of Trump’s close friends. There’s a precedent to disqualify them—during the trial, Judge Arthur Engoron decided that Giulietti could not be considered a credible witness and argued that Garten had “professional interests in this litigation.”

Garten, however, snapped back at that. “The court found no such thing. The AG statement is reckless and completely untrue,” Garten said in response to the filing, according to The Washington Post.

So far, Trump has tried and failed to pause the rapidly growing interest on the judgment, counteroffering the court a $100 million bond in lieu of the full amount. He has also approached several brokers and 30 suretors for help securing a bond, though it didn’t seem to work out for him, according to a filing by Trump’s attorneys, who admitted that suretors refused to accept Trump’s real estate as collateral. Instead, they would only accept cash to the tune of $1 billion, which Trump said he and his businesses just don’t have.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Polling this far out is going to be bad. As election day gets closer more and more of this information will trickle down to the low information voters.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Polling this far out is going to be bad.

True...

But this is worse than it normally is.

Biden s barely winning national polls. And since the electoral college favors Republican states so much, there is no way Biden can pull a trump and lose the popular vote but still win the election.

And if you zero in on battleground states, the same is true.

We're worse off than normal.

[–] capital_sniff@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I don't disagree and on a fundamental level this is a disaster. The fact that this election is close and represents a choice between a right wing authoritarian and Joe Biden is absolutely ridiculous. I'm just hoping the undecided voters make the right decision this November.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Yeah, but at a certain point we need to ask why these people are the only other option.

Biden spent $13/vote in 2020, almost double trump's 7/vote to win 2016.

https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-billion-dollar-campaign-spent-13-every-vote-1553058

Biden spent over a billion dollars to win his last election, and this one will be even more expensive.

We can blame millions of voters for not holding their noses.

But we shouldn't let the people running the party and Biden off the hook. We all did it four years ago, and now they're doing it again.

Even his most feverent supporters openly admit the reason this debt relief is happening is the upcoming election, which means there's zero reason to expect anything more after election day.

But we're stuck in this vicious cycle where every election it costs more to get votes for bad candidates, so the next time they take more money from the wealthy, and become worse candidates.

When any cycle we could just run a candidate that's actually popular, spend 100s of millions less in advertising, and have a good president not reliant on keeping the 1% happy to get re-elected.

Either we eventually fix the system, or shit never gets better.