this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
66 points (100.0% liked)

videos

22709 readers
79 users here now

Breadtube if it didn't suck.

Post videos you genuinely enjoy and want to share, duh. Celebrate the diversity of interests shared by chapochatters by posting a deep dive into Venetian kelp farming, I dunno. Also media criticism, bite-sized versions of left-wing theory, all the stuff you expected. But I am curious about that kelp farming thing now that you mentioned it.

Low effort / spam videos might be removed, especially weeb content.

There is a cytube that you can paste videos into and watch with whoever happens to be around. It's open submission unless there's something important to commandeer it with at the time.

A weekly watch party happens every Saturday (Sunday down under), with video nominations Saturday-Monday, voting Monday-Thursday. See the pin for whatever stage it's currently in.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] Swoosegoose@hexbear.net 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yea which means iridaniotter was correct in saying the oldest zoomers just reach average childbearing age.

[–] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 5 points 8 months ago

Yes but we all know that statistic is already skewed due to people having children at an older age than past generations. If they’re reaching the average childbearing age now, that’s already older than past averages. I guess I’m more so commenting on the part where they said how it was possible to have statistics on this when Gen Z is barely at average childbearing age. It’s possible because they’re comparing it to past generations.

[–] mar_k@hexbear.net 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Roughly two-thirds of 25-29 year olds are childless, and we have no idea what % of that two-thirds will choose to have kids in their 30's

[–] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes that means they’re already older than previous generations for having children that’s my point.

[–] mar_k@hexbear.net 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I thought your point is gen z's old enough now to have stats on if they'll have kids or not. I'm saying we'll have to wait until they're several years older to get an idea on if they're never having them or just pushing it off

Also, the oldest, borderline gen zers will have very similar numbers to the youngest millennials. you'd wanna get a scope of middle gen z and the average zoomer is still like 19/20

[–] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The point of the initial poster was that how can you know what the trend for having children at whatever age is already for Gen Z if they just reached the average age to have children? But they’re already trending older than the average of past generations. You don’t really need to wait another 5 or 10 years, the trend is already there and the causes for that trend don’t look to be going away anytime soon.