435
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 114 points 3 months ago

Lead poisoning is still the prevalent theory, I think. It fucks up brain development in ways that make kids tend to sociopathic personalities.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 50 points 3 months ago

I’m always glad to hear more people know about lead poisoning. It makes a lot of sense.

[-] thejoker8814@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

I’m curious, you got anything light reading you can recommend to ease into the topic, please pm me. I’d appreciate, if it wasn’t another post which basically recites the content of another post, and so on - far too much out there these days)

[-] mick@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago

No. It’s not possible to find light reading about lead.

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago
[-] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 2 points 3 months ago

Mythbusters disagrees

[-] DigitalNirvana@lemm.ee 19 points 3 months ago

It’s called The Lead-Crime Hypothesis, and you can find vetted info on it, here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead%E2%80%93crime_hypothesis?wprov=sfti1).

Here’s a recent meta-analysis: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166046222000667

Society has not yet realized how important it is to clean up this issue. But we’re getting there.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 9 points 3 months ago

Society has not yet realized how important it is to clean up this issue.

If you're talking about removing lead from our society, it seems the progress made over the past 40 years has been incredibly dramatic

[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

If you have 15 minutes this Veritasium is well done and explains the history that led to the problem.

https://youtu.be/IV3dnLzthDA?si=96jrGM0juzEDGUvb

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

If you've got Disney+ Cosmos has an entire episode about the history of the discovery of how bad leaded gasoline was

[-] Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

What is the excuse for mass shootings then?

[-] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 34 points 3 months ago

Availability of weapons mixed with infrastructure development that atomizes communities to the point that the only places some people can find any social activity is nihilistic message boards full of psychopaths that actively encourage terroristic attacks on society but in the oblique way that dodges accountability for it when someone actually goes and does it.

[-] cogman@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago
  1. Easy access to guns
  2. The rise of easy access fascist media
  3. The dissolution of public institutions

It's simply too easy to grab a gun by anyone. Military grade equipment is available to pretty much anyone with a credit card. Then you combine that with a CONSTANT beating drum from people like Alex Jones talking about how much they want crush, destroy, kill their enemies and how corrupt everything is. Then also talking about how people need to rise up and do "something". While also in the same breath telling people to go off their meds and how any sort of treatment for mental disorders is actually poison. Then pair that with the fact that there's pretty much no public infrastructure around public health (thanks Reagan). That means if you are having some sort of mental break down, depression, whatever, if you can't afford the $100s/$1000s of dollars to get regular psychiatric treatment you are basically just going to be untreated. There is also pretty much no safe place to recoup for someone in distress but not at risk of suicide. But even if there were, even if you could afford it, fascists and preachers know that mentally healthy people are harder to grift so they spend all their time demonizing the very help you'd need.

However, not everyone that does this is mentally unwell. Some are just hateful fascists that believe killing gets their hate filled messages into the world. It's why it is irresponsible for any media outlet to publish the name or manifestos of these assholes. Having notorious killers encourages more notorious killers.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

As to that first point, you know we had AR-15s in the 70s, right? (No one gave a shit. They weren't "cool" until the Assault Weapons Ban. Yeah, that didn't work out so well...)

You know guns were far easier to get back then? LOL, I got an old Mossberg 500 (think classic 12-gauge pump) that was branded Revelation. They sold those at Western Auto stores.

It was no thing to see a dude with a loaded gun rack in his pickup. Point being, access is not the thing that changed.

And the rest of your post? On. The. Money.

[-] cogman@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

As to that first point, you know we had AR-15s in the 70s, right?

The other 2 factors are important along with the internet. There may have been less legal barriers to getting an AR-15, that does not mean accomplishing such a task was easy to do. It's not like there were AR-15 ads on TV or in newspapers (well, there may have been, but that would have been highly regional). It's not like every city had an "AR-15" guy in the yellow pages. Legal access hasn't changed, but general access has (particularly to assault rifles).

Regardless, my advocacy is first just starting with laws I think most everyone can agree with, red flag laws. Take away or don't allow the purchase of guns by a domestic abusers or someone with a history of violence. Heck, you could even put a time limit on that stuff like "within the last 7 years".

A ton of these cases are fairly young men (<20). So it would be enough to say "hey, if you are under 25 and your school teachers say 'Do not let this kid in particular have a gun'" then you don't get a gun until you turn 25. Or even an outright ban on ownership for people less than 25 (though that'd be much less popular).

https://www.statista.com/statistics/971544/number-k-12-school-shootings-us-age-shooter/

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Current gun laws are pretty restricted compared to things that used to be allowed. The big one is mail order guns, you could just send a money order and get pretty much any semi-auto gun you wanted delivered to your house with no background check at all.

Full auto gums required a tax stamp since the 30s, and weren't banned until 86.

[-] Immersive_Matthew@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago

Great explanation. All things we can solve, but choose not too.

[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Weapons availability and the mental health crisis. In countries without easy access to guns, mass killings are conducted with knives or cars (runovers). And in countries with socialized healthcare that includes mental health, mass killings don't happen, at all, or very rarely if ever. Socioeconomic inequality is usually the third element, like in the fire triad, mix the three and you get mass shootings.

[-] endhits@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Shit life syndrome. The difference is they turn their misery outwards instead of committing suicide.

[-] theodewere@kbin.social 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

too many scared assholes who love their guns more than anything else.. highly sensitive momma's boys in love with their guns, always ready to lose their shit..

this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
435 points (98.7% liked)

News

21721 readers
3235 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS