politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I am instantly suspicious. If the thesis is "the experts think things are good, but the non-experts don't agree, I'm on team non expert" then that's instantly a little weird.
Bro what the fuck
Those first few things sound pretty good
Right? Is there a reason to disagree with the idea that they're good things, and if someone "feels" things aren't good, then maybe the issue is their feelings and perception and not the economic reality?
Yes, it can. Is it? In this case?
Well, by all means, if we're looking for an accurate picture, let's focus in on the metric that includes people who worked 1 hour a week or people who gave up looking for work in "employed." Let's not address anything related to the actual results that are being shown by other metrics, but merely point out that in a theoretical sense they could potentially be misleading, in some scenarios, whether or not that's the current scenario.
Dude. This next piece is even worse. It's a fucking masterclass in misleading. It's honestly impressive.
Okay, so first, the reality:
So with that reality in mind, let's look at how they try to spin it into something bad:
Accurate (the numbers are up above, but they do not attempt to present them, for obvious reasons -- they just explain what they are, in a way that strongly implies that they would show a bad picture if they decided to show them)
Accurate, he did
Accurate. There are 336 million people in the United States. If 1.25 percent of them are worse off, then millions of Americans are worse off than they were in 2020.
Accurate. Again, the majority of Americans have had their income rise faster than inflation. And yet, by making the completely true statement that "millions" of people have had their income fall, they make a little trickiness that sounds like the typical person has had their income fall.
Median income is actually pretty steady (-1%). The average increase stems from growth at the bottom, no change in the middle, and loss at the top. I.e. reduced inequality. That's very unusual for a challenging economic time.
Yes, according to them and many other experts Biden-friendly and not. But this framing makes it sound like only the Biden friendly people say this.
So we're winning, but it could be a "sawtooth," so it doesn't count. Got it.