this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
188 points (87.9% liked)

Selfhosted

38769 readers
123 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 41 points 5 months ago (6 children)

the amount of people jumping to the worst possible conclusions on this is concerning.

I mean it is more or less accepted in this day and age that most services are selling your data. Virtually every single one of them are doing it. So it's a reasonable assumption, I think.

[–] ArmoredCavalry@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Many are, but as far as I know, no hosting provider has ever tried something like what was claimed (which is why it made such news).

It seems like many people didn't even verify that portion of ToS was new (checking web archive), or wait for Vultr's response before closing their accounts.

Even after the official response, it feels like people stuck to their original assumptions and felt justified moving services?

Companies, and specifically the people in them, make mistakes. What matters is their reaction. I'm scratching my head to think what Vultr could do better in this case (other than creating a time machine to avoid the initial screw up).

[–] helenslunch@feddit.nl 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

They could have written a privacy policy that states unequivocally, and in no uncertain terms, that they don't sell user data. That should be a top priority for any VPS, because it's almost the only reason they exist.

[–] ArmoredCavalry@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)
[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 8 points 5 months ago

What response are you expecting, exactly? There's lots of competition out there and data privacy is an extremely sensitive topic. It's not the kind of mistake you can recover from. They screwed up, they lost customers, end of story.

Also personally I don't believe for a second that it was a mistake. The hell it was. Any lawyer worth their salt would have pointed out the issue right away. Either they wrote it without a lawyer or they wrote it on purpose.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)