this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
117 points (100.0% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

17932 readers
2 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

See also https://forum.endeavouros.com/t/floorp-going-closed-source/52783

Edit: They claim they will make that part open source too, eventually, and it is due to behavior of another browser: https://github.com/Floorp-Projects/Floorp-core/issues/62

Edit 2: They just open sourced the private repository 7 minutes ago, 2024-03-24T12:39Z

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] esaru@beehaw.org 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I appreciate your detailed description of the probable benefits of telemetry. While I acknowledge there are benefits, however, before accepting a given set of telemetry, I would like to know with sources and in exact terms (not just 'improved UI') what enhancements were made to Firefox that couldn't be achieved without telemetry. I want to decide for myself if those features are truly important enough to justify sending my personal data to the developers. Only then can I make an informed decision, and it still wouldn't necessarily mean agreement. It's not paranoia; it's simply refusing telemetry for any reason given.

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I hear and understand you. There's absolutely no way you should just blindly accept Telemetry. But there are companies that deserve your faith until they fuck up. Mozilla is one of them. It's also worth noting that they only keep Telemetry data for 1 year: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/telemetry-clientid#:~:text=Firefox%20collects%20telemetry%20data%20by,interaction%20data%20and%20technical%20data.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Curious, do you have some extension that makes Firefox support #:~:text?

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Did the link not work for you?

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 1 month ago

The link always works but doesn't navigate to the text fragment. Not until October's Firefox 131, at least.