this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
300 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37757 readers
578 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zacryon@feddit.de 9 points 8 months ago (4 children)

To be fair, you don't need a very huge 3D printer for that, if you divide it into a lot of smaller parts which can be assembled later.

Idk, if we can already print steel though and whether we can make it structually sufficiently stable.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 55 points 8 months ago (3 children)

So our proposal is we prefab a bunch of metal pieces and assemble them on-site?

As opposed to our current method where we carve bridges out of a big block of metal?

[–] Zacryon@feddit.de 9 points 8 months ago

Hahahaha absolutely. :D The difference is, that they come from a 3D printer and that's cool.

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Well no, you put a conveyor belt in front of all the 3d printers, and when each part is done, it's dumped onto the conveyor belt, which leads all the pieces to an AI powered robot arm which assembles the bridge.

Yeah, I guess you could just run the conveyor belt and arm all the way to where the bridge needs to go.

All problems can be reduced to Factorio.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Where's the train? Why is there no train in the solution?

[–] teawrecks@sopuli.xyz 4 points 8 months ago

The bridge is science to unlock the train, of course.

[–] CatOnTheChainWax 5 points 8 months ago

Seriously, how we make bridges now with giant CNC machines is so inefficient! And all these people saying we should print lots of blocks to put together are totally forgetting about Legos, we all just need to donate our old Legos to Baltimore and let kids from anywhere come volunteer to build it. Free bridge and free child labour! Everyone wins

[–] hascat@programming.dev 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I find it difficult to believe that breaking down steel to be 3d printed into large structures for a bridge is faster or more energy efficient than casting the parts instead.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

casting the parts

Steel beams get extruded and rolled, or... 3D printed with a large custom-shaped hot end! 🀯

https://youtu.be/lHTq-zLk-fw

[–] Skua@kbin.social 9 points 8 months ago

We can indeed print steel with direct metal laser sintering. I think that the object needs heat treatment afterwards, though to be fair it is almost ten years since I properly read up on it and things have probably advanced since then

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Maybe, we could just print off rectangular prism-shaped modules, around the right size to fit in a hand, and then assemble them on site. We could even make them out of ordinary clay and fire them for strength. I wonder why nobody has thought of that. /s

3D printing has it's place, but more conventional methods have theirs too. If you are counting on a lot of human labour anyway you might as well not reinvent the wheel.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 2 points 8 months ago

OP said use AI, not humans... /s