this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
1020 points (98.8% liked)

linuxmemes

21304 readers
1131 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
    •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    1020
    Why don't banks like root on Android? (lemmy.world)
    submitted 7 months ago by Waffelson@lemmy.world to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    188 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    So just warn the user that it's their own responsibility and all claims are waived, instead of just saying "no" ?

    [–] markstos@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    There is parallel with masking. The bank values the safety of the whole rather than the freedom to root for an individual. You stand to lose only your own bank balance. The bank stands to lose the funds of every rooted phone that contains a banking app exploit targeting them.

    [–] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

    I mean, they get that anyway with malware and security exploits. Except that rooted phones usually have a root manager, which asks for permission if an app wants to do more. And i don't think the root user listening into the app/their own account should be a problem; because in this case the problem is with the banks' security practice.

    Well, at least my bank doesn't care about root or safety net.

    [–] markstos@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

    The concern is not much phones rooted with intent by their owners, but phones rooted by malware without the owner’s consent:

    https://thehackernews.com/2021/10/this-new-android-malware-can-gain-root.html

    If there was a way to signal that a rooted phone was actually secure, malware would send that signal.