this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2024
1115 points (98.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

19471 readers
1183 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ActionHank@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I would advocate for using each tool, where it makes sense, to achieve a more intelligible graph. This is what I've been moving towards on my personal projects (am solo). I imagine with any moderately complex group project it becomes very difficult to keep things neat.

In order of expected usage frequency:

  1. Rebase: everything that's not 2 or 3. keep main and feature lines clean.
  2. Merge: ideally, merge should only be used to bring feature branches into main at stable sequence points.
  3. Squash: only use squash to remove history that truly is useless. (creating a bug on a feature branch and then solving it two commits later prior to merge).

History should be viewable from log --all --decorate --oneline --graph; not buried in squash commits.