283
Trump’s legal delaying tactics dealt a blow as he lashes out at judge’s family
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
283 points (97.3% liked)
News
22962 readers
3814 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Honestly. The amount of shit that they are tolerating just to nail him is crazy
Imagine someone else not being able to make bail or threatening families.
No bail? Jail.
Threaten families? Jail right away
They're afraid of the ramifications of putting him in jail. I'm afraid of the ramifications of not...
At this point, I think we should call his and Magas bluff
What ramifications? Contempt of court, go to jail. They can appeal the contempt charges as they wish, how does that make any difference to the ongoing case? Dudes get fined or jailed on contempt for far less than this.
Are you familiar with who Donald Trump is or what his followers are known to do?
So threatening violence against court officials or their families is now an acceptable tactic to get your way?
That's not his point, his point is you have to allow some bullshit to prevent violence against innocent people like judge's daughters. This "above all reproach" strategy by the judges and prosecutors working against trump means that when he's finally dealt a verdict there's nothing anyone can say about the people involved and the proceedings. They literally went soft as fuck on him and he still got convicted, ideally.
I'm not sure I personally believe that is the best strategy because it makes the system look weak to the people it's supposed to be trying and makes maga base look like it has Mafia like power. That's fucking silly to give them that de facto legitimatcy imo but I can see where they are coming from.
I think that nutting up and just throwing him in jail for contempt until his trials are over would be the better course. Let them maggots whine and piss and moan and throw them in jail when they protest too hard and try to bust him out of jail.
There is an entire power dynamic at play here between the "high road" people who won't "stoop to that level" getting continually fucked by the ones who break the rules and never go to jail over it. They have an entire playbook of shit Dems won't do because they know their base will still vote for them even if they are publicly shit heads, hell that's even more of a reason to vote for them to the most far right extremists.
Why don't Dems pack the courts? Why don't Dems throw him in jail for contempt? Why don't Dems move quicker in the literal treason case over selling state secrets? They need to play hardball and they won't do it. They won't get dirty and fight back.
No, I don't think it's acceptable, but there are definitely concerns that jailing Trump will result in terrorism. I understand the desire to minimize that possibility while preserving justice as much as possible. We're reaching an impasse though...
I'm familiar with "no one is above the law" and how that is ever-more being made a fucking joke by these people who don't want to upset the fascists.
Admitting, on live television, to firing a Federal Investigator to avoid being investigated? Believe it or not, Jail.
I think your thinking of the bond, which isn't criminal. Without bond he doesn't go to jail, the courts can just liquidate during the appeal if he didn't post bond. (Which could be catastrophic to him if they start selling properties)
Driving too fast: Jail. Too slow: Jail.