this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
70 points (93.8% liked)

Privacy

32456 readers
686 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If the owner of the standard notes will now be a proton, doesn't that contradict this principle? I have a proton email account but I don't want it linked to my standard notes account. I don't strongly trust companies that offer packaged services like google or Microsoft. I prefer to have one service from one company. I am afraid that now I will have to change where I save my notes. What do you guys think about this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

I've been self-hosting Standard Notes for a while, and if you think it's something you can pull off, I'd recommend it. Especially if you can get by without folders, (too many) fancy editors, or some of the extra cloud stuff they have been offering.

If you don't feel like self-hosting, there are other options too, like

  • The non-self-hostable but E2EE-encrypted and open-source Notesnook
  • The closed source but extensible Obsidian, which doesn't seem very interested in locking you into any tying
  • The somewhat clunky but powerful and open-source Joplin
[–] survivalmachine@beehaw.org 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

Maybe Logseq, too.

+FOSS like Joplin and unlike Obsidian
+plaintext markdown files like Obsidian and unlike Joplin's janky database
-less feature-rich than obsidian
-block-based instead of note-based, so a slight paradigm-shift is required

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You can add two spaces at the end of every line to manually trigger
a line break

[–] survivalmachine@beehaw.org 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Is there a problem with your Lemmy client? My comment renders fine on Raccoon.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago

Maybe, but I'm pretty sure "end a line in two spaces to ensure a line break is inserted" is standard Markdown. I can see the source fine but not the formatted comment.

[–] mraow_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 8 months ago

Eternity doesn't render that fine and neither do any of the websites and frontends I've tried. It's likely Raccoon in specific renders this as you intended, but it is in the markdown spec — that Lemmy mostly follows — that "strictly" two line breaks are needed to render one line break in HTML.

It isn't very "what you see is what you get"...

[–] mraow_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I regret I'm probably never escaping Obsidian. For a closed-source piece of software it has such a beautiful ecosystem of themes and plugins. I love to use it for writing my blog articles, and the mostly strict adherence to the markdown spec, the HTML rendering and plugins that add support for Pandoc (and Zotero)...

But by default I can't seem to get Logseq in that space, even if I really want to, where I only organise files based on metadata and folders.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

How do you get "trapped" in it? I've never used it seriously, but my last experiment on Android requires you to create a folder to write Markdown files to. Which seems about as portable as any app can possibly be; it could disappear from your devices tomorrow, and you'd still have all your stuff, right?

FWIW Markor also lets you edit Markdown files locally on Android, and it's probably a far cry from Obsidian but it could easily serve as a drop-in replacement in such a scenario.

[–] mraow_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It's not about the files, I'm very happy with files being local and easily synced and messed with. It is as you say, you create a folder which Obsidian reads as a "vault" and create .md files and folders in there, plus the hidden folders that let Obsidian organise plugins...

But I'm also not exclusively using it on Android, it's my desktop driver for just about everything text. Especially please with the community plugins which make it extremely accessible for someone with additional needs when it comes to reading or writing, the recent improvements to tables and the plugins that integrate it with Pandoc and Zotero.

I was never able to replace what it was with anything except maybe Logseq, and even the Logseq couldn't replace all of the functionality and theming. I tried living a few days in Logseq, just moving my vault there, but it didn't work so well.

It's not a major issue, I would like to move to FOSS but it's not an emergency like moving away from Google is an emergency.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Thanks for the detailed answer! I was aware of the community plugins (and I'm very pleased Obsidian isn't trying to sell them to anyone) but wasn't sure if there was anything else going on under the hood... Plugin configuration definitely makes sense.

And gives me an excuse to start exporting the stuff I've got in my local Standard Notes instance too. I like their interface, but their mobile clients kept throwing me out by switching to the default server, and the web client disabled non-official synching too, so I'm starting to like the idea of having an actual copy of the notes rather than hoping SN doesn't have another fit.

[–] mraow_@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 months ago

Again, depending on your needs perhaps Logseq is fine. It seems that developers of each app (Logseq and Obsidian namely) have this expectation of how users want to use their apps but in my experience they are both configurable to use Tags, Folders or Links to organise content. This lets you take notes and organise in several ways.

Logseq is FOSS, Obsidian is not and is more popular (thus larger community plugins/themes ecosystem). That's the main difference.

I would love for someone to walk me around what SN can do and walk someone around what Obsidian can do.

[–] Templa@beehaw.org 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My biggest issue with Logsec is the CLA signing. I still use it but don't feel like contributing to it anymore

[–] survivalmachine@beehaw.org 1 points 8 months ago

Oof. I did not know about that. That's unfortunate!

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I just wish any of them had a native Android UI instead of a weird, janky mess that is Logseq and iOS clone in Obsidian.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

It seems like apps are all using web apps as a shortcut for deploying cross platform functionality. Which is sometimes fine until you run into compatibility or UI issues like those.

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

I mean yeah, I get it, and I know the same's the reason behind everyone and their dog using Electron, but in both cases the result is... not great.

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

I’ve been self-hosting Standard Notes for a while, and if you think it’s something you can pull off, I’d recommend it.

Too bad it requires 2GB of RAM. Joplin is "perfect" but the UI is ugly.

[–] gamedeviancy@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I know these apps but none of them is as good as standard notes in my opinion. Notesnook seems fine but I don't like fact that it is based in Pakistan. I used Joplin before buying a sub for standard notes so I know it.

Currently I have also subscription on Crypt.ee for photos but there is also a notes app integrated. Maybe I'll start using it. Developer of cryptee was very active on reddit and he seems like a man who values privacy and security.

But I hope that simply proton will not force the migration of standard notes accounts to proton accounts and for old users everything will be as before.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Is there anything won't with the company itself being in Pakistan, if it's explicitly hosting your data in Germany? I'm not aware of any nation-level threat going on over there, and their client is open-source on all platforms, so I don't imagine there's much that would be compromised.

[–] gamedeviancy@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Idk, maybe I'm wrong. Notesnook is recommended by privacyguides at all. All my mistrust comes from the fact that such countries are not famous for respecting human rights. What if the government forces the owners to give up the keys? Maybe it's an unrealistic scenario cause data is encrypted.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

You're asking the right questions.

Regarding keys: they never store those. If they did, that would be a problem from the beginning. The whole point of E2EE encryption is that the servers and server owners should never be able to access your data even if you wanted them to.

[–] gamedeviancy@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Yes, you had me cause I write only about keys, but I thought also about backdoors on gov demand.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

If you're worried about backdoors, you can build every client from source and verify the code. IIRC they haven't paid for an audit, but if they failed to protect your passwords/keys that'd be really bad for their reputation. And considering their target demographic, it's pretty important to keep that part of the reputation alive.

[–] clmbmb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago

Notesnook is open source and you can check (if you have the knowledge) if there are any issues. They're working on making the server self-hostable (also fully open source) so there's that.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

What's the upside over self-hosted (and encrypted) Trilium, which is what I currently use? (I ask this not as a challenge, but out of curiosity.)

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

From the looks of it, Trillium is halfway between Standard Notes and hosting your own wiki.

If you're happy with Trillium, I'd say stick with it. It looks pretty good, TBH. Standard Notes is self-hostable more as an afterthought, which is to its detriment.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Thanks, appreciate it!